BackJW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd Overview

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd Total Liabilities

Track JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd's total liabilities ($380M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$380.77M
↓ 25.46% YoYΔ $-130.06M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd Total Liabilities History

Loading

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd (JWCTF) FAQ

JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd posts a total liabilities of $380M as of June 2026. That compares with $510M in the prior-year period — down 25.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd's total liabilities was $510M. The latest reading is $380M — a 25.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd's financial statement story. At $380M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JWCTF's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging JW (Cayman) Therapeutics Ltd against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $380M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.