BackJacobs Solutions Overview
Jacobs Solutions Inc

Jacobs Solutions Debt to Equity

Jacobs Solutions (J) has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.55, above the Industrials sector average of 1.29.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

1.55

Debt to Equity

1.55

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Jacobs Solutions (J) FAQ

Jacobs Solutions posts a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.55. That is above the Industrials sector average of 1.29. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a debt-to-equity ratio near 1.29 is typical. Jacobs Solutions's 1.55 is higher that level. That is roughly 20.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Jacobs Solutions's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.55 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for J's debt-to-equity ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 1.29), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Jacobs Solutions's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Jacobs Solutions against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in debt-to-equity ratio easier to interpret. Start with 1.55 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.