BackAugwind Energy Tech Storage Overview
Augwind Energy Tech Storage Ltd.

Augwind Energy Tech Storage P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Augwind Energy Tech Storage: -9.62 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

-9.62

P/E Ratio

-9.62

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Augwind Energy Tech Storage (ITGMF) FAQ

Augwind Energy Tech Storage (ITGMF) currently reports a P/E ratio of -9.62. That is below the Industrials sector average of 31.46. Use the charts on this page to explore Augwind Energy Tech Storage's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Augwind Energy Tech Storage's P/E ratio of -9.62 is lower than the Industrials sector average of 31.46. That is roughly 130.6% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Augwind Energy Tech Storage's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -9.62, ITGMF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Industrials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of -9.62, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Industrials average is 31.46. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Augwind Energy Tech Storage, and consider following ITGMF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Augwind Energy Tech Storage is classified in the Industrials sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows -9.62 versus a sector average near 31.46. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing ITGMF with unrelated industries.