BackInternational Game Technology PLC Overview

International Game Technology PLC Operating Income

Latest operating income for IGT: $570M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Operating Income

$139.00M
45.7% YoY

As of Jun 30, 2025

Annual Operating Income (TTM)

$566.00M
44.78% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jun 30, 2025

Average Operating Income (Comparison Companies)

Operating Income History

Operating Income Comparison

Annual Operating Income Growth Rate (%)

Annual Operating Income Growth (Absolute)

International Game Technology PLC (IGT) FAQ

International Game Technology PLC posts a operating income of $570M as of June 2025. That compares with $1B in the prior-year period — down 44.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, International Game Technology PLC's operating income was $1B. The latest reading is $570M — a 44.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Operating Income is one piece of International Game Technology PLC's financial statement story. At $570M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IGT's operating income usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; International Game Technology PLC's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging International Game Technology PLC against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in operating income easier to interpret. Start with $570M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.