Latest PEG ratio for International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct: -85.81 — see history and peer comparisons.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow-85.81
The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct (IFFT) currently reports a PEG ratio of -85.81. That is below the Materials sector average of 10.8. Use the charts on this page to explore International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's PEG ratio of -85.81 is lower than the Materials sector average of 10.8. That is roughly 894.6% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -85.81, IFFT can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current PEG ratio of -85.81, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 10.8. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct, and consider following IFFT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct is classified in the Materials sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -85.81 versus a sector average near 10.8. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing IFFT with unrelated industries.