Latest P/E ratio for International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct: 86.38 — see history and peer comparisons.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow86.38
The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct (IFFT) currently reports a P/E ratio of 86.38. That is above the Materials sector average of 15.59. Use the charts on this page to explore International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's P/E ratio of 86.38 is higher than the Materials sector average of 15.59. That is roughly 454.1% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 86.38, IFFT can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current P/E ratio of 86.38, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 15.59. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct, and consider following IFFT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
International Flavors & Fragrances - Unit (1Prpd Stk Pur contrct is classified in the Materials sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 86.38 versus a sector average near 15.59. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing IFFT with unrelated industries.