BackInternational Flavors & Fragrances Overview
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

International Flavors & Fragrances P/E Ratio

Valuation check: IFF's P/E ratio is 76.71, above the Materials sector average of 24.92.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

76.71

P/E Ratio

76.71

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) FAQ

International Flavors & Fragrances posts a P/E ratio of 76.71. That is above the Materials sector average of 24.92. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a P/E ratio near 24.92 is typical. International Flavors & Fragrances's 76.71 is higher that level. That is roughly 207.9% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

International Flavors & Fragrances's P/E ratio of 76.71 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for IFF's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 24.92), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; International Flavors & Fragrances's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging International Flavors & Fragrances against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 76.71 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.