BackInfrastructure and Energy Alternatives Overview

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Long Term Debt

Track Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives's long-term debt ($370M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$367.08M
0.52% YoYΔ $1.89M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Long Term Debt History

Loading

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (IEA) FAQ

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives posts a long-term debt of $370M as of June 2022. That compares with $370M in the prior-year period — up 0.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives's long-term debt was $370M. The latest reading is $370M — a 0.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives's financial statement story. At $370M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IEA's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $370M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.