BackHarrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 Overview

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 Long Term Debt

Track Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25's long-term debt ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$299.80M
539.91% YoYΔ $252.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 Long Term Debt History

Loading

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 (HROWM) FAQ

Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 posts a long-term debt of $300M as of June 2026. That compares with $47M in the prior-year period — up 539.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25's long-term debt was $47M. The latest reading is $300M — a 539.9% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HROWM's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Harrow- 11.875% NT REDEEM 31/12/2027 USD 25 against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.