BackHealthcare Services Group Overview
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

Healthcare Services Group Target Price

Where could HCSG trade next? Consensus target price: $29.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Share Price

$21.82

Average Target Price

$29.0032.9% upside

2 analysts in the last 4 months

High: $30 | Low: $28

Analyst Recommendations

No recommendations in the last 4 months.

Revenue & Income Forecast

Analysts' Target Prices

DateAnalystPrice TargetCurrent Upside/Downside
2026-08-19Oppenheimer$2828.3% upsideOpen
2026-07-08UBS$3037.5% upsideOpen
2026-04-23RBC Capital$2410% upsideOpen
2026-04-23UBS$2723.7% upsideOpen
2026-04-23BMO Capital$2410% upsideOpen
2026-02-12UBS$2514.6% upsideOpen
2026-02-12BMO Capital$220.8% upsideOpen
2026-02-12Robert W. Baird$235.4% upsideOpen
2025-10-28UBS$220.8% upsideOpen
2025-04-24Robert W. BairdAndrew Wittmann$1340.4% downsideOpen
2024-07-25Robert W. BairdAndrew Wittmann$1435.8% downsideOpen
2022-04-21Credit Suisse$1817.5% downsideOpen
2022-04-21RBC CapitalSean Dodge$208.3% downsideOpen

Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) FAQ

Healthcare Services Group posts a target price of $29. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

A target price of $29 for HCSG means covering analysts, on average, see the stock 32.9% upside of $21.82 over about 12 months. Dig into who set the high and low targets and how recently they updated — freshness matters as much as the average itself.

Context for HCSG's target price usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Healthcare Services Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Healthcare Services Group against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in target price easier to interpret. Start with $29 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.