BackGazit-Globe Overview
Gazit-Globe Ltd.

Gazit-Globe PEG Ratio

Valuation check: GZTGF's PEG ratio is -17.37, below the Real Estate sector average of 38.17.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-17.37

PEG Ratio

-17.37

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Gazit-Globe (GZTGF) FAQ

Gazit-Globe (GZTGF) currently reports a PEG ratio of -17.37. That is below the Real Estate sector average of 38.17. Use the charts on this page to explore Gazit-Globe's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Gazit-Globe's PEG ratio of -17.37 is lower than the Real Estate sector average of 38.17. That is roughly 145.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Gazit-Globe's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -17.37, GZTGF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Real Estate peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of -17.37, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Real Estate average is 38.17. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Gazit-Globe, and consider following GZTGF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Gazit-Globe is classified in the Real Estate sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -17.37 versus a sector average near 38.17. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Real Estate are usually more informative than comparing GZTGF with unrelated industries.