BackGroupon Overview
Groupon Inc

Groupon Debt to Equity

Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Groupon: -4.35 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

-4.35

Debt to Equity

-4.35

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Groupon (GRPN) FAQ

Groupon (GRPN) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of -4.35. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.77. Use the charts on this page to explore Groupon's debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.

Groupon's debt-to-equity ratio of -4.35 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.77. That is roughly 668.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Groupon's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -4.35, GRPN can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of -4.35, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 0.77. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Groupon, and consider following GRPN for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Groupon is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows -4.35 versus a sector average near 0.77. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing GRPN with unrelated industries.