BackGeorgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 Overview

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for GPJA: $42B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$42.34B
13.39% YoYΔ $5.00B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 (GPJA) FAQ

Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 posts a net tangible assets of $42B as of June 2026. That compares with $37B in the prior-year period — up 13.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25's net tangible assets was $37B. The latest reading is $42B — a 13.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25's financial statement story. At $42B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GPJA's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Georgia Power Co - 5% NT REDEEM 01/10/2077 USD 25 against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $42B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.