BackAcushnet Holdings Overview
Acushnet Holdings Corp

Acushnet Holdings P/E Ratio

Valuation check: GOLF's P/E ratio is 25.35, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 47.18.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

25.35

P/E Ratio

25.35

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

Average P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) FAQ

Acushnet Holdings (GOLF) currently reports a P/E ratio of 25.35. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 47.18. Use the charts on this page to explore Acushnet Holdings's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Acushnet Holdings's P/E ratio of 25.35 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 47.18. That is roughly 46.3% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Acushnet Holdings's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 25.35, GOLF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 25.35, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 47.18. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Acushnet Holdings, and consider following GOLF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Acushnet Holdings is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 25.35 versus a sector average near 47.18. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing GOLF with unrelated industries.