BackGildan Activewear Overview
Gildan Activewear Inc

Gildan Activewear PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Gildan Activewear: -76.12 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-76.12

PEG Ratio

-76.12

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Gildan Activewear (GIL) FAQ

Gildan Activewear (GIL) currently reports a PEG ratio of -76.12. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 5.5. Use the charts on this page to explore Gildan Activewear's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Gildan Activewear's PEG ratio of -76.12 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 5.5. That is roughly 1484.7% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Gildan Activewear's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -76.12, GIL can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of -76.12, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 5.5. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Gildan Activewear, and consider following GIL for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Gildan Activewear is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -76.12 versus a sector average near 5.5. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing GIL with unrelated industries.