BackFairfax Financial Holdings Limited Overview

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited Receivables

Track Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited's receivables ($12B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$12.38B
1453.15% YoYΔ $11.58B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited Receivables History

Loading

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FRFHF) FAQ

Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited posts a receivables of $12B as of June 2026. That compares with $800M in the prior-year period — up 1453.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited's receivables was $800M. The latest reading is $12B — a 1453.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited's financial statement story. At $12B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FRFHF's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $12B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.