BackFrequency Therapeutics Overview

Frequency Therapeutics Net Tangible Assets

Track Frequency Therapeutics's net tangible assets ($100M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$103.23M
10.32% YoYΔ $-11.88M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Frequency Therapeutics Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Frequency Therapeutics vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Frequency Therapeutics Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Frequency Therapeutics (FREQ) FAQ

Frequency Therapeutics posts a net tangible assets of $100M as of June 2026. That compares with $120M in the prior-year period — down 10.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Frequency Therapeutics's net tangible assets was $120M. The latest reading is $100M — a 10.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Frequency Therapeutics's financial statement story. At $100M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FREQ's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Frequency Therapeutics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Frequency Therapeutics against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $100M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.