BackFirst Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) Overview

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) Receivables

Latest receivables for FMBIP: $470M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$467.01M

Peer average

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) Receivables History

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) (FMBIP) FAQ

First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) posts a receivables of $470M as of December 2021. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int)'s receivables was $0. The latest reading is $470M (period ending December 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int)'s financial statement story. At $470M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for FMBIP's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging First Midwest Bancorp - 7% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (1/40 Int) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $470M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.