Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Flutter Entertainment Plc: 1.65 — see history and peer comparisons.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow1.65
Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.
Flutter Entertainment Plc (FLUT) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.65. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.86. Use the charts on this page to explore Flutter Entertainment Plc's debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.
Flutter Entertainment Plc's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.65 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.86. That is roughly 92.7% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Flutter Entertainment Plc's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 1.65, FLUT can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of 1.65, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 0.86. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Flutter Entertainment Plc, and consider following FLUT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Flutter Entertainment Plc is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows 1.65 versus a sector average near 0.86. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing FLUT with unrelated industries.