Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Fidelity National Information Services: 1.38 — see history and peer comparisons.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow1.38
Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.
Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.38. That is above the Technology sector average of 0.36. Use the charts on this page to explore Fidelity National Information Services's debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.
Fidelity National Information Services's debt-to-equity ratio of 1.38 is higher than the Technology sector average of 0.36. That is roughly 283.0% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Fidelity National Information Services's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 1.38, FIS can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Technology peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of 1.38, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Technology average is 0.36. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Fidelity National Information Services, and consider following FIS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Fidelity National Information Services is classified in the Technology sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows 1.38 versus a sector average near 0.36. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing FIS with unrelated industries.