BackFirst Foundation Overview
First Foundation Inc

First Foundation PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for First Foundation: 7.27 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

7.27

PEG Ratio

7.27

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

First Foundation (FFWM) FAQ

First Foundation (FFWM) currently reports a PEG ratio of 7.27. That is below the Finance sector average of 16.86. Use the charts on this page to explore First Foundation's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

First Foundation's PEG ratio of 7.27 is lower than the Finance sector average of 16.86. That is roughly 56.9% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates First Foundation's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 7.27, FFWM can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Finance peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 7.27, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Finance average is 16.86. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for First Foundation, and consider following FFWM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

First Foundation is classified in the Finance sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 7.27 versus a sector average near 16.86. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Finance are usually more informative than comparing FFWM with unrelated industries.