BackFenbo Holdings Overview
Fenbo Holdings Ltd.

Fenbo Holdings PEG Ratio

Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) has a PEG ratio of -1.6, below the Technology sector average of 10.5.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-1.60

PEG Ratio

-1.60

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) FAQ

Fenbo Holdings (FEBO) currently reports a PEG ratio of -1.6. That is below the Technology sector average of 10.5. Use the charts on this page to explore Fenbo Holdings's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Fenbo Holdings's PEG ratio of -1.6 is lower than the Technology sector average of 10.5. That is roughly 115.3% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Fenbo Holdings's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -1.6, FEBO can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Technology peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of -1.6, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Technology average is 10.5. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Fenbo Holdings, and consider following FEBO for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Fenbo Holdings is classified in the Technology sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -1.6 versus a sector average near 10.5. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing FEBO with unrelated industries.