BackFortune Brands Home & Security Overview
Fortune Brands Home & Security Inc

Fortune Brands Home & Security Return on Equity

Valuation check: FBHS's ROE is 8.28%, below the Industrials sector average of 22.29%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

8.28%

Return on Equity

8.28%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

Average ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS) FAQ

Fortune Brands Home & Security (FBHS) currently reports a ROE of 8.28%. That is below the Industrials sector average of 22.29%. Use the charts on this page to explore Fortune Brands Home & Security's ROE history and peer comparisons.

Fortune Brands Home & Security's ROE of 8.28% is lower than the Industrials sector average of 22.29%. That is roughly 62.9% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Fortune Brands Home & Security's current 8.28% should be judged against Industrials norms (sector average: 22.29%) and against FBHS's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of 8.28%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Industrials average is 22.29%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Fortune Brands Home & Security, and consider following FBHS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Fortune Brands Home & Security is classified in the Industrials sector. On ROE, it currently shows 8.28% versus a sector average near 22.29%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing FBHS with unrelated industries.