BackFattal Holdings (1998) Overview
Fattal Holdings (1998) Ltd.

Fattal Holdings (1998) P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Fattal Holdings (1998): 924.55 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

924.55

P/E Ratio

924.55

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Fattal Holdings (1998) (FATLF) FAQ

Fattal Holdings (1998) (FATLF) currently reports a P/E ratio of 924.55. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 51.44. Use the charts on this page to explore Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Fattal Holdings (1998)'s P/E ratio of 924.55 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 51.44. That is roughly 1697.2% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Fattal Holdings (1998)'s market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 924.55, FATLF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 924.55, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 51.44. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Fattal Holdings (1998), and consider following FATLF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Fattal Holdings (1998) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 924.55 versus a sector average near 51.44. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing FATLF with unrelated industries.