BackExpeditors International Of Washington Overview

Expeditors International Of Washington Other Current Liabilities

Expeditors International Of Washington's other current liabilities is $750M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$753.27M
70.95% YoYΔ $312.63M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Expeditors International Of Washington Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Expeditors International Of Washington vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Expeditors International Of Washington Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Expeditors International Of Washington (EXPD) FAQ

Expeditors International Of Washington posts a other current liabilities of $750M as of March 2026. That compares with $440M in the prior-year period — up 70.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Expeditors International Of Washington's other current liabilities was $440M. The latest reading is $750M — a 70.9% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Expeditors International Of Washington's financial statement story. At $750M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EXPD's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Expeditors International Of Washington's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Expeditors International Of Washington against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $750M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.