BackEsprit Holdings Limited Overview

Esprit Holdings Limited Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for ESHDF: $29M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$29.30M
50.34% YoYΔ $-29.70M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Esprit Holdings Limited Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Esprit Holdings Limited vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Esprit Holdings Limited Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Esprit Holdings Limited (ESHDF) FAQ

Esprit Holdings Limited posts a other current liabilities of $29M as of December 2025. That compares with $59M in the prior-year period — down 50.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Esprit Holdings Limited's other current liabilities was $59M. The latest reading is $29M — a 50.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Esprit Holdings Limited's financial statement story. At $29M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ESHDF's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Esprit Holdings Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Esprit Holdings Limited against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $29M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.