BackEscalade Overview
Escalade, Inc.

Escalade P/E Ratio

Valuation check: ESCA's P/E ratio is 11.89, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 44.5.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

11.89

P/E Ratio

11.89

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

Average P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Escalade (ESCA) FAQ

Escalade (ESCA) currently reports a P/E ratio of 11.89. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 44.5. Use the charts on this page to explore Escalade's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Escalade's P/E ratio of 11.89 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 44.5. That is roughly 73.3% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Escalade's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 11.89, ESCA can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 11.89, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 44.5. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Escalade, and consider following ESCA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Escalade is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 11.89 versus a sector average near 44.5. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing ESCA with unrelated industries.