BackTelefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Overview
Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson - ADR

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson: 12.35 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

12.35

P/E Ratio

12.35

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

Average P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (ERIC) FAQ

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson posts a P/E ratio of 12.35. That is below the Technology sector average of 36.16. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a P/E ratio near 36.16 is typical. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's 12.35 is lower that level. That is roughly 65.8% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's P/E ratio of 12.35 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for ERIC's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 36.16), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 12.35 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.