BackElekta AB Class B Overview

Elekta AB Class B Other Current Liabilities

Track Elekta AB Class B's other current liabilities ($2.9B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$2.92B
70.81% YoYΔ $-7.08B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Elekta AB Class B Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Elekta AB Class B vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Elekta AB Class B Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Elekta AB Class B (EKTAF) FAQ

Elekta AB Class B posts a other current liabilities of $2.9B as of July 2026. That compares with $10B in the prior-year period — down 70.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Elekta AB Class B's other current liabilities was $10B. The latest reading is $2.9B — a 70.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending July 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Elekta AB Class B's financial statement story. At $2.9B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EKTAF's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Elekta AB Class B's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Elekta AB Class B against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.9B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.