BackEagle Plains Resources Overview

Eagle Plains Resources Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for EGPLF: $2.6M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$2.63M
384.98% YoYΔ $2.09M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Eagle Plains Resources Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Eagle Plains Resources vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Eagle Plains Resources Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Eagle Plains Resources (EGPLF) FAQ

Eagle Plains Resources posts a other current liabilities of $2.6M as of March 2026. That compares with $540K in the prior-year period — up 385.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Eagle Plains Resources's other current liabilities was $540K. The latest reading is $2.6M — a 385.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Eagle Plains Resources's financial statement story. At $2.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EGPLF's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Eagle Plains Resources's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Eagle Plains Resources against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $2.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.