BackEducational Development Overview
Educational Development Corp.

Educational Development PEG Ratio

Valuation check: EDUC's PEG ratio is 13.14, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 4.97.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

13.14

PEG Ratio

13.14

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Educational Development (EDUC) FAQ

Educational Development posts a PEG ratio of 13.14. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 4.97. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a PEG ratio near 4.97 is typical. Educational Development's 13.14 is higher that level. That is roughly 164.4% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Educational Development's PEG ratio of 13.14 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for EDUC's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 4.97), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Educational Development's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Educational Development against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 13.14 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.