BackEagle Bancorp Montana Overview
Eagle Bancorp Montana Inc

Eagle Bancorp Montana Debt to Equity

Eagle Bancorp Montana (EBMT) has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.49, below the Finance sector average of 1.98.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

0.49

Debt to Equity

0.49

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Eagle Bancorp Montana (EBMT) FAQ

Eagle Bancorp Montana posts a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.49. That is below the Finance sector average of 1.98. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Finance stocks, a debt-to-equity ratio near 1.98 is typical. Eagle Bancorp Montana's 0.49 is lower that level. That is roughly 75.2% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Eagle Bancorp Montana's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.49 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for EBMT's debt-to-equity ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 1.98), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Eagle Bancorp Montana's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Eagle Bancorp Montana against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in debt-to-equity ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.49 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.