BackDicks Sporting Goods Overview
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc.

Dicks Sporting Goods P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Dicks Sporting Goods: 12.78 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

12.78

P/E Ratio

12.78

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS) FAQ

Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS) currently reports a P/E ratio of 12.78. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 20.44. Use the charts on this page to explore Dicks Sporting Goods's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Dicks Sporting Goods's P/E ratio of 12.78 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 20.44. That is roughly 37.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Dicks Sporting Goods's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 12.78, DKS can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 12.78, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 20.44. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Dicks Sporting Goods, and consider following DKS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Dicks Sporting Goods is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 12.78 versus a sector average near 20.44. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing DKS with unrelated industries.