BackInnovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Overview

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Intangible Assets

Latest intangible assets for DDFN: $420M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$422.94M
7.01% YoYΔ $-31.87M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Intangible Assets History

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF (DDFN) FAQ

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF posts a intangible assets of $420M as of September 2021. That compares with $450M in the prior-year period — down 7.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's intangible assets was $450M. The latest reading is $420M — a 7.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's financial statement story. At $420M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DDFN's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $420M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.