BackInnovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Overview

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Long Term Debt

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's long-term debt is $900M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$896.70M
0.96% YoYΔ $-8.68M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Long Term Debt History

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF (DDFD) FAQ

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF posts a long-term debt of $900M as of September 2021. That compares with $910M in the prior-year period — down 1.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's long-term debt was $910M. The latest reading is $900M — a 1.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's financial statement story. At $900M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DDFD's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $900M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.