BackYunhong CTI Overview
Yunhong CTI Ltd

Yunhong CTI P/E Ratio

Valuation check: CTIB's P/E ratio is -2.3, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 20.78.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

-2.30

P/E Ratio

-2.30

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Yunhong CTI (CTIB) FAQ

Yunhong CTI (CTIB) currently reports a P/E ratio of -2.3. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 20.78. Use the charts on this page to explore Yunhong CTI's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Yunhong CTI's P/E ratio of -2.3 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 20.78. That is roughly 111.1% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Yunhong CTI's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -2.3, CTIB can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of -2.3, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 20.78. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Yunhong CTI, and consider following CTIB for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Yunhong CTI is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows -2.3 versus a sector average near 20.78. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing CTIB with unrelated industries.