BackCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. Overview
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. - ADR

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.: 25.77 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

25.77

PEG Ratio

25.77

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) FAQ

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC) currently reports a PEG ratio of 25.77. That is above the Materials sector average of 10.8. Use the charts on this page to explore Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s PEG ratio of 25.77 is higher than the Materials sector average of 10.8. That is roughly 138.6% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.'s market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 25.77, CPAC can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 25.77, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 10.8. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A., and consider following CPAC for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. is classified in the Materials sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 25.77 versus a sector average near 10.8. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CPAC with unrelated industries.