BackColumbia Banking System Overview

Columbia Banking System Common Stock

Track Columbia Banking System's common stock ($7.7B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Common Stock
$7.70B
32.19% YoYΔ $1.88B vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Columbia Banking System Common Stock History

Loading

Columbia Banking System vs. peers: Common Stock Comparison

Loading

Columbia Banking System Common Stock Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company). Positive growth indicates new issuance/dilution; negative growth indicates reductions/buybacks.

Loading

Columbia Banking System (COLB) FAQ

Columbia Banking System posts a common stock of $7.7B as of June 2026. That compares with $5.8B in the prior-year period — up 32.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Columbia Banking System's common stock was $5.8B. The latest reading is $7.7B — a 32.2% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Common Stock is one piece of Columbia Banking System's financial statement story. At $7.7B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for COLB's common stock usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Columbia Banking System's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Columbia Banking System against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in common stock easier to interpret. Start with $7.7B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.