BackChardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) Overview

Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) Profit Margin

Valuation check: CNTQW's profit margin is -132.07%, below the sector sector average of 19.61%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Profit Margin

-33.33%
23.01% YoY

As of Jun 2026

Annual Profit Margin (TTM)

-132.07%
136.52% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jun 2026

Average Profit Margin (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Profit Margin History

Loading

Profit Margin Comparison

Loading

Annual Profit Margin Growth Rate (%)

Loading

Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) (CNTQW) FAQ

Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026)'s profit margin stands at -132.07% as of June 2026. That compares with -55.84% in the prior-year period — down 136.5% year over year. That is below the sector sector average of 19.61%. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) reported -132.07% in profit margin versus -55.84% a year earlier — a 136.5% year-over-year decrease. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) sits lower the its sector benchmark (19.61%) with a profit margin of -132.07%. That is roughly 773.6% below the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

A profit margin of -132.07% for Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026) means each unit of related capital or sales is generating that return rate. Higher is usually better for profitability metrics, but extremely high figures can reflect one-time items or thin equity bases. Review several years of data on this page before extrapolating.

The history chart shows how Chardan NexTech Acquisition 2 - Warrants (29/07/2026)'s profit margin evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places CNTQW next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.