BackCanadian National Railway Overview
Canadian National Railway Co.

Canadian National Railway PEG Ratio

Canadian National Railway (CNI) has a PEG ratio of 345.85, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 5.5.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

345.85

PEG Ratio

345.85

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Canadian National Railway (CNI) FAQ

Canadian National Railway posts a PEG ratio of 345.85. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 5.5. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a PEG ratio near 5.5 is typical. Canadian National Railway's 345.85 is higher that level. That is roughly 6191.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Canadian National Railway's PEG ratio of 345.85 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for CNI's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 5.5), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Canadian National Railway's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Canadian National Railway against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 345.85 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.