BackCore Molding Technologies Overview
Core Molding Technologies

Core Molding Technologies P/E Ratio

Valuation check: CMT's P/E ratio is 30.38, above the Materials sector average of 24.82.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

30.38

P/E Ratio

30.38

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Core Molding Technologies (CMT) FAQ

Core Molding Technologies (CMT) currently reports a P/E ratio of 30.38. That is above the Materials sector average of 24.82. Use the charts on this page to explore Core Molding Technologies's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Core Molding Technologies's P/E ratio of 30.38 is higher than the Materials sector average of 24.82. That is roughly 22.4% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Core Molding Technologies's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 30.38, CMT can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 30.38, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 24.82. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Core Molding Technologies, and consider following CMT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Core Molding Technologies is classified in the Materials sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 30.38 versus a sector average near 24.82. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CMT with unrelated industries.