BackContinental Resources(OKLA) Overview

Continental Resources(OKLA) Total Liabilities

Track Continental Resources(OKLA)'s total liabilities ($12B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$11.76B
14.31% YoYΔ $1.47B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Continental Resources(OKLA) Total Liabilities History

Loading

Continental Resources(OKLA) vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Continental Resources(OKLA) Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Continental Resources(OKLA) (CLR) FAQ

Continental Resources(OKLA) posts a total liabilities of $12B as of March 2026. That compares with $10B in the prior-year period — up 14.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Continental Resources(OKLA)'s total liabilities was $10B. The latest reading is $12B — a 14.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Continental Resources(OKLA)'s financial statement story. At $12B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CLR's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Continental Resources(OKLA)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Continental Resources(OKLA) against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $12B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.