BackCaladrius Biosciences Overview
Caladrius Biosciences Inc

Caladrius Biosciences Return on Equity

Latest ROE for Caladrius Biosciences: -177.35% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

-177.35%

Return on Equity

-177.35%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Caladrius Biosciences (CLBS) FAQ

Caladrius Biosciences (CLBS) currently reports a ROE of -177.35%. That is below the Healthcare sector average of 21.67%. Use the charts on this page to explore Caladrius Biosciences's ROE history and peer comparisons.

Caladrius Biosciences's ROE of -177.35% is lower than the Healthcare sector average of 21.67%. That is roughly 918.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Caladrius Biosciences's current -177.35% should be judged against Healthcare norms (sector average: 21.67%) and against CLBS's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of -177.35%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Healthcare average is 21.67%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Caladrius Biosciences, and consider following CLBS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Caladrius Biosciences is classified in the Healthcare sector. On ROE, it currently shows -177.35% versus a sector average near 21.67%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Healthcare are usually more informative than comparing CLBS with unrelated industries.