BackChina Green Agriculture Overview

China Green Agriculture Total Current Liabilities

Track China Green Agriculture's total current liabilities ($66M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$66.20M
6.02% YoYΔ $3.76M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Green Agriculture Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

China Green Agriculture vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

China Green Agriculture Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Green Agriculture (CGA) FAQ

China Green Agriculture (CGA) currently reports a total current liabilities of $66M as of September 2025. That compares with $62M in the prior-year period — up 6.0% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore China Green Agriculture's total current liabilities history and peer comparisons.

China Green Agriculture's total current liabilities increased from $62M to $66M — a 6.0% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2025). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

China Green Agriculture reported $66M in total current liabilities as of September 2025. That compares with $62M in the prior-year period — up 6.0% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current total current liabilities of $66M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for China Green Agriculture, and consider following CGA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

China Green Agriculture is classified in the Materials sector. On total current liabilities, it currently shows $66M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CGA with unrelated industries.