BackChina Green Agriculture Overview

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets

Track China Green Agriculture's net tangible assets ($88M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$88.22M
14.35% YoYΔ $-14.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

China Green Agriculture vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Green Agriculture (CGA) FAQ

China Green Agriculture (CGA) currently reports a net tangible assets of $88M as of September 2025. That compares with $100M in the prior-year period — down 14.4% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore China Green Agriculture's net tangible assets history and peer comparisons.

China Green Agriculture's net tangible assets decreased from $100M to $88M — a 14.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2025). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

China Green Agriculture reported $88M in net tangible assets as of September 2025. That compares with $100M in the prior-year period — down 14.4% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current net tangible assets of $88M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for China Green Agriculture, and consider following CGA for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

China Green Agriculture is classified in the Materials sector. On net tangible assets, it currently shows $88M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CGA with unrelated industries.