BackChina Green Agriculture Overview

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets

Track China Green Agriculture's net tangible assets ($88M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$88.22M
14.35% YoYΔ $-14.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

China Green Agriculture vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

China Green Agriculture Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Green Agriculture (CGA) FAQ

China Green Agriculture posts a net tangible assets of $88M as of September 2025. That compares with $100M in the prior-year period — down 14.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Green Agriculture's net tangible assets was $100M. The latest reading is $88M — a 14.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of China Green Agriculture's financial statement story. At $88M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CGA's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Green Agriculture's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Green Agriculture against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $88M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.