BackCompagnie Financiere Richemont SA Overview

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA Total Liabilities

Latest total liabilities for CFRHF: $19B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$18.60B
1.27% YoYΔ $-238.90M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA Total Liabilities History

Loading

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA (CFRHF) FAQ

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA posts a total liabilities of $19B as of March 2026. That compares with $19B in the prior-year period — down 1.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's total liabilities was $19B. The latest reading is $19B — a 1.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's financial statement story. At $19B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CFRHF's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $19B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.