Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th (CDZIP) has a PEG ratio of -14.49, below the Utilities sector average of 11.78.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow-14.49
The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.
Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th (CDZIP) currently reports a PEG ratio of -14.49. That is below the Utilities sector average of 11.78. Use the charts on this page to explore Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.
Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th's PEG ratio of -14.49 is lower than the Utilities sector average of 11.78. That is roughly 222.9% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -14.49, CDZIP can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Utilities peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current PEG ratio of -14.49, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Utilities average is 11.78. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th, and consider following CDZIP for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Cadiz - PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A 1/1000th is classified in the Utilities sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -14.49 versus a sector average near 11.78. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Utilities are usually more informative than comparing CDZIP with unrelated industries.