BackCCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Overview
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings P/E Ratio

Valuation check: CCCS's P/E ratio is 92.27, above the Technology sector average of 34.62.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

92.27

P/E Ratio

92.27

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

Average P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings (CCCS) FAQ

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings posts a P/E ratio of 92.27. That is above the Technology sector average of 34.62. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a P/E ratio near 34.62 is typical. CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings's 92.27 is higher that level. That is roughly 166.5% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings's P/E ratio of 92.27 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for CCCS's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 34.62), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 92.27 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.