BackChina National Building Material Company Limited Overview

China National Building Material Company Limited Intangible Assets

Latest intangible assets for CBUMY: $38B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$38.31B
↑ 20.48% YoYΔ $6.51B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

China National Building Material Company Limited Intangible Assets History

Loading

China National Building Material Company Limited vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

China National Building Material Company Limited Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China National Building Material Company Limited (CBUMY) FAQ

China National Building Material Company Limited posts a intangible assets of $38B as of June 2026. That compares with $32B in the prior-year period — up 20.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China National Building Material Company Limited's intangible assets was $32B. The latest reading is $38B — a 20.5% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of China National Building Material Company Limited's financial statement story. At $38B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CBUMY's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China National Building Material Company Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China National Building Material Company Limited against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $38B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.