BackBabcock & Wilcox Enterprises Overview

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises Total Liabilities

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises's total liabilities is $940M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$942.23M
6.91% YoYΔ $-69.94M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises Total Liabilities History

Loading

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) FAQ

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises posts a total liabilities of $940M as of June 2026. That compares with $1B in the prior-year period — down 6.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises's total liabilities was $1B. The latest reading is $940M — a 6.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises's financial statement story. At $940M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BW's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $940M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.